Transfer Pricing Audit & Litigation Support
Strategic, evidence-led representation through every stage of a transfer pricing dispute — from the first TPO notice to appellate proceedings and final order.
Direct Answer
Transfer Pricing India's in-house lawyers and Chartered Accountants represent clients at every stage of a TP dispute — TPO assessment, DRP objections, CIT(A) and ITAT appeals — with continuity of strategy from documentation through final order.
One dispute strategy from audit notice to final appeal
Transfer pricing disputes rarely turn on a single comparable company or one margin calculation. They usually involve a combination of facts, contractual terms, functional characterisation, economic analysis, segmental profitability, evidence quality and procedural compliance. A successful defence therefore requires the technical and legal positions to remain consistent from the first response before the Transfer Pricing Officer through every subsequent appellate stage.
Our transfer pricing audit and litigation support in India integrates Chartered Accountants, economists and legal professionals so that submissions are commercially accurate, technically defensible and procedurally complete. We review the original transfer pricing documentation, identify gaps, reconcile transaction values and develop a dispute narrative that reflects the taxpayer's actual conduct.
Where the dispute concerns method selection, tested-party choice, comparables, working-capital adjustments, risk adjustments, capacity utilisation or segmental results, we rebuild the economic record using auditable data. Where the dispute is legal or procedural, we frame grounds based on the statute, rules, circulars and relevant judicial principles.
We also advise on the consequences that may follow a primary adjustment, including interest exposure, penalty risk and secondary adjustment issues under Section 92CE. This allows management to evaluate settlement, appeal and cash-flow implications together rather than treating each item in isolation.
When to involve us
At receipt of the first notice, during an ongoing TPO proceeding, after a draft assessment order, before filing DRP objections, or while preparing an appeal before CIT(A) or the ITAT.
Early involvement is ideal because factual inconsistencies, missing evidence and weak economic positions are easier to correct before they become part of the assessment record.
Representation across the full transfer pricing litigation cycle
We tailor the strategy to the forum, the available record and the relief realistically achievable at each stage.
TPO Proceedings
We review notices, prepare factual and technical submissions, defend the FAR analysis, explain the selected method and respond to challenges involving comparables, filters, margins, adjustments and transaction characterisation.
Our TPO representation in India also includes coordinating evidence, management explanations and reconciliation schedules so that the assessment record is complete and internally consistent.
DRP Objections
We analyse the draft assessment order and prepare detailed DRP objections covering factual mistakes, legal grounds, benchmarking defects, procedural violations and inappropriate adjustments.
Each objection is supported by references to the record, relevant documents and clear relief sought, reducing the risk of broad or unsupported grounds.
CIT(A) Appeals
Where the statutory route lies before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), we prepare the statement of facts, grounds of appeal, written submissions, paper books and supporting applications.
We also identify additional evidence or legal grounds that may be required and coordinate the presentation of the case during appellate proceedings.
ITAT Appeals
For an ITAT transfer pricing appeal, we develop the final appellate strategy, prepare concise grounds, organise the paper book and produce technical and legal notes for the hearing.
The focus is on isolating the decisive issues, preserving the factual record and presenting the economic analysis in a form that is easy for the Bench to follow.
Secondary adjustment advisory under Section 92CE
A primary transfer pricing adjustment can have consequences beyond the additional taxable income. We assess whether Section 92CE applies, quantify the amount involved, review repatriation requirements and evaluate the deemed-advance implications and available exceptions. This analysis is integrated with the wider litigation strategy so the taxpayer understands the complete financial and compliance exposure.
A disciplined process built around facts, evidence and forum strategy
Each stage builds on the previous one, avoiding contradictions and repeated rework.
Case Diagnostic
We review the transfer pricing study, Form 3CEB, notices, orders, agreements, financial data and prior submissions. We then identify the strongest issues, evidentiary gaps, procedural risks and potential exposure.
Evidence & Economics
We reconcile transaction values, prepare segmental workings, test comparables, examine filters and adjustments, and collect supporting records for functions, risks, services, pricing and commercial conduct.
Submission Strategy
We frame factual and legal arguments for the relevant forum, prepare written submissions and paper books, and ensure every contention is connected to evidence already on record or properly introduced.
Hearing & Follow-Through
We support oral representation, respond to queries, track directions and review the final order. Where further appeal or consequential proceedings are required, the strategy continues without restarting from zero.
Technical depth with continuity of legal strategy
Integrated Legal & Tax Team
Lawyers and Chartered Accountants work together so legal grounds, economic analysis and financial evidence support the same case theory.
Evidence-Led Defence
We do not rely on generic submissions. Agreements, invoices, employee records, workings, segmental data and benchmarking evidence are organised around each disputed issue.
Continuity Across Forums
The same core team follows the matter from TPO proceedings through DRP, CIT(A) or ITAT, reducing inconsistency and preserving institutional knowledge.
Common questions
Received a TPO notice or draft assessment order?
Get an early case review before filing your next response, objection or appeal.
Related: Mutual Agreement Procedure · Benchmarking & Comparability